Brandon Hargis

Mechanical Engineer · Aerospace Concentration · EIT Certified

I'm a Mechanical Engineering graduate from the University of Arkansas with hands-on experience designing, building, and testing real engineering systems. I've worked across the full engineering cycle — from trade studies and CAD modeling to structural analysis, physical testing, and technical documentation. I bring both the technical foundation and the drive to see a project through from first concept to final test.

🏅 Engineer-in-Training (EIT) Certified  ·  License #9944  ·  Passed FE Exam

View Resume

Skills

A mix of design, analysis, and hands-on engineering tools built through coursework, competition, and industry experience.

  • SolidWorks & AutoCAD / Civil 3D
  • MATLAB & Data Analysis
  • FEA & Structural Load Testing
  • 3D Printing, CNC & Laser Cutting
  • Technical Documentation & Reports
  • Engineer-in-Training (EIT) #9944

Projects

A collection of engineering projects spanning structural design, fluid systems, and aerospace — each involving real design decisions, hands-on testing, and technical documentation.

Design Build Fly (DBF) — "Soaring Swine" UAV

AIAA Competition · University of Arkansas · Aug 2024 – May 2025 · Role: Mechanical Designer & Test Engineer

As part of the University of Arkansas' 14-member Wild Warthogs team, I contributed to the full design, build, and test cycle of a competition radio-controlled aircraft — the Soaring Swine — for the 2024-2025 AIAA Design Build Fly competition. The aircraft was designed to carry external fuel pylons and deploy an autonomous sub-aircraft (the X-1 "Plummeting Piglet") in flight across four scored missions.

🔍 Click any drawing to expand

My Contributions

  • Designed and modeled structural systems in SolidWorks, applying fluid and structural load principles to wing, fuselage, and landing gear components.
  • Developed and executed structural test plans using custom-fabricated rigs for both destructive and non-destructive testing.
  • Performed static G-load testing, tip-to-tip wing tests, and dynamic drop tests to validate structural integrity under competition loads.
  • Collaborated with aerodynamics and propulsion sub-teams to refine designs for durability, manufacturability, and mission compliance.
  • Prepared detailed technical documentation and contributed to formal design reviews throughout the project.

Aircraft Overview

The final design was a dual-motor monoplane with a dihedral high-wing, conventional tail, and tail-dragger landing gear — selected through systematic trade studies across wing shape, tail configuration, propulsion, and landing gear. The wing used an FX 76-120 root airfoil optimized for maximum payload lift, with an SG4022 tip airfoil providing aerodynamic twist for improved lift-to-drag performance. The airframe was built using a balsa-carbon rod construction with 3D-printed ABS integration components and laser-cut parts.

22.7 lbsMax Takeoff Weight
16 lbsM2 Payload Capacity
61.5 mphMax Airspeed
80%Carry Capacity Increase
11.45Peak CL/CD

Key Engineering Highlights

  • Wing optimization: Used XFLR5 and an iterative Excel solver to derive maximum takeoff weight, wing loading, aspect ratio, and neutral point. Aerodynamic twist via tip airfoil change reduced induced drag and improved L/D at all angles of attack.
  • Structural analysis: Topological optimization of wing center pieces in nTopology minimized weight while maintaining strength under 2G pylon loads. FEA validated landing gear mounts under 400N normal and shear loads.
  • Propulsion system: Dual SunnySky X3120 585KV brushless motors with EOLO 13x7 propellers and 22.2V 6S LiPo batteries. Static thrust testing confirmed 8.38 lbf per motor — 23.6% above the calculated M2 requirement of 6.78 lbf.
  • Pylon system: Spring-loaded locking hatch mechanism designed for single-motion engagement to minimize ground mission time. Pylon spanwise position analytically optimized to 47.8% half-span to minimize bending stress across all load cases.
  • X-1 sub-aircraft: A 22g flying wing (ASA-CF filament) with bell-shaped lift distribution and static elevons for stable orbital descent — no GPS or servo required, saving over 1.77 oz.
  • Manufacturing: CNC laser-cut double-ply cross-grain balsa ribs, 3D-printed ABS structural joints, carbon fiber rod spars, and Ultracote shrink wrap skin.
SolidWorks XFLR5 MATLAB OpenVSP FEA (ANSYS) nTopology Structural Testing 3D Printing Laser Cutting Carbon Fiber Technical Documentation

Pump & Heat Exchanger Performance Study

Thermal & Fluid Systems Lab · University of Arkansas · Apr 2025 – May 2025 · Group of 4

Conducted a full experimental study of a centrifugal pump and brazed plate heat exchanger system, applying fundamental fluid mechanics and thermodynamics principles to experimentally determine real-world performance and compare against theoretical predictions. The experiment spanned two major subsystems — a variable-speed pump loop and a configurable plate heat exchanger — with data collected across multiple operating conditions.


Pump Performance Study

The pump was tested at four RPM settings (max, ¾, ½, and ¼ speed) across multiple flow rates to experimentally generate pump curves and system curves, then validated against pump affinity law predictions.

  • Calculated pump head using the simplified Bernoulli-based pressure equation, accounting for inlet and outlet pressure gauge readings at each operating point.
  • Applied pump affinity laws to predict how head, flow rate, and power scale with RPM changes — then compared predicted values against experimental data at each operating state.
  • Calculated pump efficiency at each operating point using measured current, voltage, specific weight, flow rate, and head — finding that efficiency peaked at maximum RPM and maximum flow, consistent with theoretical predictions.
  • Affinity law predictions were most accurate at higher flow and RPM settings (2–4% error), with error increasing to 20–40% at quarter-speed settings due to steady-state timing and flow meter variability.

Heat Exchanger Performance Study

The brazed plate heat exchanger was tested in both parallel flow and counter flow configurations at two heater temperatures (60°C and 45°C) and four cold-water flow rates (18, 12, 8, and 4 L/min), with the hot water flow rate held constant throughout.

Parallel Flow
  • Tested at 60°C and 45°C heater settings
  • Cold water varied from 18 → 4 L/min
  • Energy transfer rate decreased as cold flow decreased
  • Lower cold flow → higher efficiency (more dwell time)
Counter Flow
  • Tested at same conditions as parallel flow
  • Counter flow at 60°C, 4 L/min cold water = highest efficiency
  • Consistent with manufacturer guidance favoring counter flow
  • Results show stronger temperature gradient maintenance
  • Calculated energy transfer rates for both hot and cold water sides using Q = ṁCpΔT — deviations between the two quantified experimental error.
  • Calculated heat exchanger effectiveness using ε = Q/Qmax, where Qmax used the minimum fluid capacity rate and maximum temperature difference between inlet streams.
  • Identified cold-water feed line pressure variability (shared line across all lab stations) as the primary error source — hot-water energy transfer rate used for final calculations as the more reliable measurement.
  • Authored a complete technical report including abstract, theory, experimental methods, data tables, error analysis, discussion, and conclusions.
4RPM Settings Tested
2HX Configurations
2–4%Affinity Law Error (High RPM)
4 L/minBest HX Efficiency Flow Rate
MATLAB Pump Affinity Laws Pipe Flow Analysis Heat Transfer Thermodynamics Data Analysis Error Analysis Technical Reporting

Contact Me

I'm actively looking for entry-level mechanical engineering roles. Feel free to reach out — I'd love to connect.